Missile OR 747? [Archive]

Alice Cullen

03-01-2005, 01:27 PM

I saw this thread earlier and just didnt have the time to post... but this DEFINITELY raises some disturbing questions.... I dont doubt the FBI would have seized all video (http://69.42.87.196/cgi-bin/v40/ezlclk.fcgi?id=6689) footage for investigation... what DOES look suspicious, as the video illustrates... is the beautiful green pentagon lawn right outside the crash site... and the fact that there was no wreckage reported to be found... Like the quote.... the wings, the tail.... they would have been strewn out on the lawn.... Peoople dont realize how FRAGILE plane are... even ones as big as 757s.

See What I Mean. (http://www.freewebs.com/titaniazane/Cessna172HurricaneDamage.JPG) That is a picture of WIND DAMAGE [hurricane winds shift violently and quite suddenly] to a small aircraft.... Even the big airplanes have LIMITS when it comes to wind... and flying along at high airspeeds, sudden movement can cause shit to start PEELING off.... shit like WINGS... tails are built to support a LOT of weight and stuff... but still... these airplanes arent made of TITANTIUM.... they wouldnt fly that way... they are made of ALUMINUM... you know... that stuff soda cans are made out of? That stuff we can crush with our hands and bend which way we please? Yeah. I dont want to freak out you frequent flyers... because flying airplanes is a SCIENCE... and we control a lot of what happens in the air... its not normal for wings to shear off, lol... BUT... If WIND can do something like that to a plane... you can IMAGINE how impact with a building would take the wings right off... Furthermore... did ANYONE notice how the airplanes that hit the World Trade Center did NOT go right through? Notice how they kind of smacked into the side of the building.... and then STOPPED? Now officials are trying to say a 757 went THROUGH three layers of the pentagon? That plane MIGHT have penetrated TWO layers... but it would have been completely destroyed midway through the second... and thats assuming the plane had NO flammable materials aboard that might have exploded... oh say, for instance JET FUEL.... and where do you all think 5000 lbs of fuel goes? IN THE WINGS. And if the wings had torn apart as i suspect they would, as they MUST have considering the pictures of round holes in the pentagon[no holes or damage from wings going through the walls]... then one must assume that the 900 GALLONS of jet fuel in the tanks of the alleged aircraft would have been exposed and caught fire or exploded... Let us imagine, for a second.... what kind of explosion 900 gallons of fuel might cause... what scale that might be on.... *raises eyebrow*

Four years ago I didnt KNOW the technical aspects of airplanes and stuff... but in my profession... we know a LOT about airplanes AND about airplane CRASHES... that doesnt look like any airplane crash site to me. I guess my recently acquired knowledge and a revisit to some of these photos (http://69.42.87.196/cgi-bin/v40/ezlclk.fcgi?id=9529) has made me skeptical. Over 500mph 2 feet off the ground? There would have been wake turbulence and SCORCH MARKS for at least a thousand feet.